EU AI Act: technical documentation and conformity
For a high-risk system, compliance is not a policy document — it is a working risk-management process, a record of the data you trained on, logs you can actually produce, and oversight a human can actually exercise. We build those with your engineers, in your stack.
For a high-risk system, compliance is not a policy document — it is a working risk-management process, a record of the data you trained on, logs you can actually produce, and oversight a human can actually exercise. We build those with your engineers, in your stack.
Evidence, not a policy binder
What gets built
We work through the requirements for high-risk systems in the order that lets engineering keep shipping.
01
Risk management system
Identified risks, mitigations, residual risk and the testing that supports the claim — as a process that runs, not a snapshot.
02
Data and data governance
Where training and validation data came from, what is in it, how bias was examined and what was done about it.
03
Logging and traceability
Records the system keeps automatically, retained long enough to reconstruct a decision.
04
Human oversight
What a person can see, override and stop — designed so it is usable under real workload, not only on paper.
05
Accuracy and robustness
Declared metrics, how they were measured, and behaviour under adversarial and degraded conditions.
06
Technical documentation
Assembled from the above, in the structure the Regulation expects, plus the declaration and registration steps.
What is included
01
We work in your repository
Documentation that lives beside the code stays current; documentation in a shared drive does not.
02
Engineering-first
Every requirement translated into something a developer can implement and test.
03
Conformity route
Which assessment path applies, what it needs, and what to prepare before you start it.
04
Handover
Your team can maintain it after we leave — that is the point.